November 19, 2007

Why People Have Affairs

There are far more viewpoints on infidelity than I care to mention. Yet, although it is considered the worst crime to commit against any person or relationship in our society, we are still fascinated by it. You could call it a morbid curiousity.

Am I the only one who is tired of seeing television dramas featuring married men and women having affairs all the time? Perhaps I am just a boring old fuddy-duddy long before my bones creak with age? Am I the only one rolling my eyes whenever I open up the covers of a magazine to find multiple choice quizzes with the title looming above: Is He Cheating On You?

Okay, okay, I’ll admit that I steal my sister’s Cosmopolitan from time to time. The only reason I do this is to see what kind of advice is written for girls these days, you understand? It is all in the name of research. Honest! ;)

Seriously. Despite the amount of attention lavished on such a topic, I find very few articles and resources that try to understand why people have affairs. What is it that drives people from the arms of those they profess to love and into the arms of a stranger, or a mutual friend? Perhaps these topics are the real questions that should grace the multiple choice quizzes featured in girly magazines?

That said, I have come across an video featuring Connie Podesta, where she attempts to explain why people have affairs. I wonder how many of you will agree with her conclusions? What are the implications if we are to accept her reasons as truth?

October 28, 2007

Not every woman is an evil feminist. They’re just women that make the news.

I discovered, to my greatest dismay, one the few authors that have made a lasting impression in my life with his books, has died. One thing I have always admired about Richard Carlson’s writing is that he was honest. The books he wrote never advertised that his ’secrets’ could end world conflict or solve all my personal, professional, and relationship problems.

Strange as this may sound, Richard Carlson feels like a father figure to me, though I have never met him. Many are the nights where I would feel lost, angry, or anxious about the world, and many are the nights that I turned quietly to one of his books to reflect on a point inside and regain a sense of perspective. The first book I picked up was when I was in my teens and the title was “Don’t sweat the small stuff for teens”

I will share with you a point made by Carlson that will encompass the main thought that inspired this article.

Avoid the 90/10 Trap:

The 90/10 trap stems from an observation I’ve made (that has been verified by hundreds of people) that most of us tend to focus our attention, thinking, and conversations on the worst 10 percent of our lives. The 90 stands for 90 percent of what happens during our day, which is usually pretty good, and the 10 percent stands for the remaining 10 percent, which is usually problematic and filled with hassle.

I call it a trap because most people seem to focus on what’s wrong with life instead of what is, generally, okay. Obviously every day is different, and some days are really bad. But the way it typically plays out is this: Suppose, for illustration’s sake, that you had ten things to do during the day. Nine of them go reasonably well. The other one doesn’t. Which one do you think about most that evening? Which one do you discuss with your parents, siblings or friends? You get the idea.

This is an accurate observation and we are all guilty of falling into this trap, not just individually but collectively. Take the news as an example, how often do we open up a newspaper or switch on the TV to find out good things that have happened around the world? Hardly ever. I often wonder if newpapers are a reflection of us constantly falling into the 90/10 trap.

The sole focus of the news is to report problems and our role is always that of a spectator. When we watch or read the news, how often are solutions offered to the problems they present? How often do you actively look to resolve these issues? Maybe in your mind they are beyond your ability to resolve. That’s fair enough; there may be world problems that are beyond our abilities to find a workable solution individually. If that is the case, why do you need to know about problems in the world if there is no way you can resolve them?

Steve Pavlina also observes:-

News is problem-obsessed. The news loves to report problems. It will tell you all the things that are wrong in gory detail. How many of those problems have you actually solved? Which ones are you hard at work solving right now? The news conditions you to worry about problems but not to actually solve them. That’s because you’re encouraged to worry about unsolvable problems and then buy the sponsors’ products to assuage your fears. Drop the news for a while, and you’ll find you naturally spend more time solving problems than worrying about them

Zogmama (a commenter on this blog) once stated that “if it bleeds, it leads” and she is correct. So how does this all relate to ‘evil feminists’?

The Gender War -believe it or not -is a big, fat 90/10 trap for the most part. MRM and feminist sites embellish the concept of the evil feminist/ evil patriarchy and…guess what? They back it up using news reports of women or men “behaving badly” take a look at these headlines for starters:

Woman gets her 2 year old son high on marijuana; Police Say Woman Sold Baby For $25K; Man rapes 14 year old child, Man robs woman at ATM…

You get the idea. It boils down to the question of half-full verses half-empty. Do you believe that people like this are the 90 percent of the population or the 10 percent? I think the 10 percent, but I am an optimist and I am a person that views optimism as a preferred life-choice.

Yet as Steve Pavlina said in his article, keeping up with the news doesn’t mean that you will know any more about the world. The coverage is too narrow and only negative. How often are we going to read about what men and women do that is positive? How accurate is it to use newspaper headlines as an example of either gender? I’ll give you a straight-forward answer: It isn’t. The news is NOT an accurate portrayal of reality. Why use it as a source of evidence on gender issues? It is a trap, and it is a trap I am keen to avoid.

Yes, there are problems. Sure, there are a number of disturbed men and women that cause harm to others. Of course, a lot of these problems need to be discussed. Yes, there are misogynistic men, and there are “evil feminists”. However, both groups are only well-known because of their shock factor, because they are so black and white, because they sit on the extreme end of the scale, or because they are far more interesting and dramatic to report. But are they really a gender issue? Are the examples shown via the news examples of men and women? No. Of course not. Or, at least I sincerely hope not.

I can be harsh on both movements at times in my articles. I don’t agree with all the attitudes from both sides. Yet, 90 percent of women that call themselves feminists are not evil. If they are active in the movement they do so because they want to make a positive difference. They wouldn’t be a part of it if they think their contribution is negative. Indeed, not every woman is even a feminist let alone an ‘evil’ one! ;)

Of Men’s Rights Activists, 90 percent are not misogynistic pigs. Many of these men have been put through the rigmarole of the family court. Or they have experiences with women that have left them questioning if the “fairer” sex is necessarily fair. There are also men who see the injustices of the system and are correct to rail against it.

Society needs rational men and women to battle any ideology that is causing harm to all of us. This is less a battle of man against woman than a battle of truth against ideologies that promote lies

I think it would be a lie to think that every woman is an ‘evil feminist’, remember they just happen to be the women that make the news. ;)

October 16, 2007

The Ultimate Solution to the Gender War

I couldn’t resist posting this advert for the Mail on Sunday currently showing in the UK. I couldn’t help but laugh at this video!

If only we could solve real-world issues (excuse the pun) as easily as the men and women solved them in this video.

Want to know the ultimate solution to the Gender War, according to the Mail on Sunday? The secret awaits below:-

September 26, 2007

On Gender Movements and Their Critics

Any movement that is influential in moulding the shape of the sexual revolution should not be immune to constructive criticism.

I wrote in an earlier post that I was disappointed with the reaction of one particular website, feministing.com to the criticisms I had of feminism. Their reaction was to ban me from posting completely. Perhaps what I had to say does not come under the realm of constructive criticism for some, but I believe my point to be important and I don’t think I deserved to be named a troll for having a different opinion.

The sad fact about this is that I am not the only one who has complained about being shut out from discussion for holding a divergent viewpoint. I have heard many accusations of feminist websites and blogs deleting comments from their websites that they disagree with. I wouldn’t have necessarily agreed with such a criticism if it wasn’t for my own experiences which showed me the complaints were not entirely false.

Of course it is the prerogative of individuals to ban posters or delete comments on their own web spaces. If they want to do such things, it is well within their rights (and powers) as individuals to do so. However, it doesn’t shed the feminist movement in a positive light when members shun and ignore those who are questioning their ideas. It gives me the distinct impression that feminist arguments are weak since so few are willing to hold their ideas up to scrutiny. Why are the feminists that I have been in contact with so far been so unwilling to communicate with me just on the account that I disagree with them? It makes you wonder, right?

I also find it fascinating upon reading an FAQ written by a website known as feminist 101 when the author states how annoying it is to have to explain their viewpoints all the time. What a shame. Perhaps if feminists viewed people that didn’t understand feminism with less impatience and disdain (i.e. actually feel flattered that people ask questions about their viewpoints rather than annoyed) more people would have sympathy for their movement.

Like it or not, feministing.com is a very popular website, it certainly does have a voice and influence in moulding the shape of the sexual revolution in the future. Unfortunately the members who post at that site are not open to honest criticism, they distance themselves from it or ignore it completely – and I think it is this factor that makes them and their movement for young feminism dangerous.

At the same time, I understand that my ideas will be held up to public scrutiny, as indeed they should be. I think it is important to always be asking questions. I am always wary of social movements that censure criticism.

I blog because I think constructive criticism is an important aspect that movements should take note of. I am interested in criticising those elements in gender movements that I consider lacking in judgement and rationality. Of course, people will do the same of my posts, for the same reasons. In the process of critique and adjustment, movements can make sure that they align themselves for the society they intend to help and change.

This is why I blog.

Related Articles

  • The sexual revolution is still revolting…er… evolving
  • Individually and collectively, we are responsible for how the sexual revolution develops in the present and into the future
  • Any movement that has the potential to mould the shape of the sexual revolution should be solution-orientated rather than promoting a victim mentality
  • September 6, 2007

    Life happens…

    …when you are planning other things!

    Is that ever correct? Absolutely.

    I haven’t been able to keep up with writing articles for this blog because life has made me very busy. I just got an offer from my first ‘proper’ employer since I have graduated. As of next Monday I will have two jobs! Great for the money (Christmas is coming up after all) but not so great for this blog, as I am not sure where I will steal any decent time to write for it, at present. We shall see.

    Just in case anyone wishes to discuss anything I have brought up on this blog in a more relaxed manner in forums, you are welcome to visit the NEW Engendertruth Forum.

    As you will see, I haven’t set everything up yet, but please feel free to browse or even register. It will be good to chat with you all. :-)

    August 6, 2007

    We are society!

    Individually and collectively, we are responsible for how the sexual revolution develops in the present and into the future.

    I hear too many examples of men and women complaining (online and offline) about how society oppresses them and/or hates their
    gender.

    For goodness sake, people! Don’t you think this is all getting beyond a joke? Or am I the only one not caught up in this absurd pandemic of paranoia and self-pity? Do you not even see how such a viewpoint is patently ridiculous? No? Of course, you are just speaking up against the oppression and hatred directed at your gender, right? Maybe you would go so far as to say I am part of the oppression? You can throw rotten fruit at me and condemn me as an oppressor of some description but only after I have explained why such a viewpoint is so ridiculous.

    I read a lot of writers on the internet dealing with the concept of society as if it were a single entity external and disconnected from them. Society is not as disconnected from you; it isn’t a single entity either. Society is the little girl playing next door with a skipping rope, the driver of your taxi, the elderly couple taking a stroll down the promenade, the lover in your bed, the mother cooking her children meals, the bank manager – are you suggesting that these people are consciously oppressing you?

    There are many dictionary definitions for the word society (over 10 to be exact) but when we talk about society this is the most frequent meaning we are referring to:-
    “A body of individuals living as members of a community; community”

    I think it is this misconception of how society exists in reality that can turn each of us into victims of oppression. Far easier to blame society for the struggles in life than to accept that life isn’t always fair or take responsibility for mistakes that we have made. We assume it has nothing to do with us and so we bury our heads in the sand. We forget all concepts of honour and responsibility because we are so busy identifying problems with this fallacious idea of “society”

    On the subject of honour and responsibility, I discussed both in my previous article What is your Honour Code? The article put forward the idea that women could have an honour code, and at the same time I was questioning why one has never been written or identified. I am not sure at this point if it is fair to state that this is because women don’t have a sense of honour or if there was never considered to be much need for one.

    However, I do think human beings are contrary creatures; being capable of committing acts of both evil and beauty. I think given our circumstances and state of mind, most of us are capable of incredible acts of beauty and grace, but at the same time we are all capable of falling to actions that are base and low.

    I think the key aspect to the concept of honour is a sense of responsibility for your actions and decisions. An understanding of cause and effect is also an essential element of such a sense of honour, because with it lies the realization that what you do and say does have an impact. I think a lot of us (me included) forget that we have the power to cause an effect upon others – for good and for bad.

    I take a lot of heart from the following extract written by Steve Pavlina:

    In 1998 I had an experience that had a deep and lasting effect on me. Erin and I were eating lunch at a local soup and salad place, and I noticed a woman cleaning the tables nearby. She looked very sad and depressed, as if she’d just been chastised by her supervisor or had gotten some bad news.

    Erin and I didn’t have a lot of money at the time — even eating this cheap meal was a stretch for our budget — but as we were getting up to leave, I walked up to this woman, handed her a $5 bill and said, “I know you’re probably not appreciated for the work you do, but I want you to know that we think you’re doing a great job.

    The woman’s facial expression changed instantly, from sadness to genuine gratitude. She looked me straight in the eye and said, “Thank you soooo much.” She did her best to hold back tears but with only partial success. I don’t recall what else she said to me, but I’ll always remember the look on her face. In that moment we really connected –human being to human being. I doubt it was the $5 that mattered to her – it was the fact that someone acknowledged her as a real person. Erin and I were both deeply moved by the experience.

    I think people have more power than they know. Even the simplest act of kindness can have a powerful impact. If we were to understand the impact we have on the people around us, I think we would understand that blaming society for the ills of life is not productive. We are a member of society and we have a responsibility over the actions and words that could affect society – namely the people in our lives.

    I think that as members of society we have both power and responsibility over our relationships with each other, it is in this area that we can make the most changes as far as the ‘sexual revolution’ goes. If we can learn to accept, understand, and finally relate to the other sex without making assumptions based on false notions of what we believe them to be, perhaps heterosexual relationships can begin to be far more fulfilling for all involved.

    Learning to better relate to each other is another way to take personal (and collective) responsibility in society. I would like to help others (and to have others help me) achieve this, through a collective knowledge and a variety of personal viewpoints.

    This is why I blog.

    Related Articles

  • The sexual revolution is still revolting…er… evolving
  • Any movement that is influential in moulding the shape of the sexual revolution should not be immune to constructive criticism.
  • Any movement that has the potential to mould the shape of the sexual revolution should be solution-orientated rather than promoting a victim mentality
  • July 26, 2007

    The sexual revolution is still revolting … err… evolving.

    Changes to gender roles are a recent phenomenon in human civilisation. Only a century and a half ago, women and men had clear roles which rarely changed throughout the course of history. Women were the primary caregivers for children; their domain was the home and family. Men were the primary sources of income; their domain was the world of economics, work, and responsibilities outside the home.

    Various factors in the course of the 19th and 20th century contributed to the change in these distinctive roles. Whatever the factors behind these changes, few can argue that the roles of women (and subsequently of men) have blurred a lot over the course of the 20th century. These changes have been, in context of wider history, very sudden.

    The sexual revolution is still in motion. Society, I believe, is still in the process of configuring the changes that have occurred. You could say that society is still dizzy from the spinning of sudden transformation, and now her view is blurry and it is hard to regain a sense of balance. Those that grew up watching these adjustments occur before their very eyes are different from the young men and women that grow up today who take these changes for granted.

    As a member of a younger generation I find the viewpoints and experiences of those who are middle-aged fascinating. Maybe their experiences are very different to mine, but their findings are valuable and need to be listened to. I urge people in my generation and younger to read what these people have discovered in the course of their lives. What have our parents and grandparents learnt from these changes? How can we take such lessons to heart? Can we change anything to make sure that history does not repeat itself? Do they have any wisdom that we can potentially share with future generations and apply to our own lives?

    To view the sexual revolution as a static tomb of history or suggest that that the sexual movement is beyond our control is to be powerless. To understand that the sexual revolution is still in motion means that we still have the power to decide its future path. In other words, the sexual revolution is in our hands. This fact alone quietens the gnawing feeling of powerlessness that you may feel.

    Blogger Power!
    I view blogging as one of the freest modes of communication in the world. Sharing different viewpoints is a way of communicating our findings and understandings and the mysteries surrounding life, the universe, and everything with people we may never meet in life. Not everyone will agree, but the simple act of open discussion is a powerful tool for change over a wide cultural audience.

    The presence of Feminist and Men’s Rights Movement blogs all point to the fact that there is still plenty of work that the sexual revolution needs to do before society can begin to settle down. Although it is a noble act that care enough about their world to write blogs about issues that concern them, it can also present a potential problem in the future.

    I don’t think all bloggers actually realize the power that they have at their disposal, I think if anything many abuse this power. With the power of communication comes a sense of responsibility – are you blogging to the god of self-expression or are you blogging to communicate value?

    I’ll be frank. I have read more Feminist and Men’s Rights Movement blogs than I care to remember. Out of those I can only count the amount of valuable communication on one hand. Very few of these sites offer much of value to anybody. Why?

    How many times do we need to hear the same shock news stories thrust down our throats used as examples of either gender? How many times does a man read a Feminist blog and come to the conclusion that men are beyond help or sexually demented in some way? How many times does a woman read a MRM blog and come to the conclusion that women are emotionally stunted and psychopathic liars. Let me tell authors of such blogs a little secret – the characteristics you are keen to ascribe to another gender are characteristics that are just as prevalent in your own. Such characterizations rarely describe gender, but human nature.

    In other words, these blogs might reveal some truth, but they are only half-truths.

    I feel the same way about shock statistics. 1 out of 4 women could be raped in their lifetime. Really? How is that even slightly helpful to the average Joe or Jane on the streets? Statistically more woman than men file for divorce. Right. These statistics may or may not be accurate, but to me such statistics are used only to rouse a reaction, they are emotive statistics (if there ever were such a concept).

    Even if I accept that 1 out of 4 women could be raped in their lifetime, statistics do not tell us what drives some men to rape, nor does it tell us how to keep safe as a woman and (more importantly) they do not offer any solutions about how to change such a shocking ‘fact’. In this case, statistics are used to criticise men, and feminists jump to the assumption that all men are capable of rape.

    Regarding the statistic that claims women file for divorce more often than men, the statistic doesn’t tell us why more women are filing for divorce, it doesn’t tell the tale of unfortunate cases where a marriage has broken down due to infidelity and other factors. Yet these statistics are used to suggest that women are flakes, and some even go to the extreme of suggesting that women only get married in order to get half of the assets. Sure, such women do exist as do rapists, but they are actually a minority. However with rampant cynicism and paranoia abound, many are led to the belief that what they read is truth, when really it is all just ammunition for the gender war.

    Unfortunately, a lot of these blogs give off the impression that to subscribe to their views and join their ranks (so to speak) is a way of speaking out against oppression. It might just be my own cynicism that prevents me from supporting such causes, but I do think there is such irony that both feminists and MRM sites publish to ‘beat the oppressors’ when it cannot be logically possible that BOTH sides be oppressed at the same time, unless they oppress each other.

    Where most would see oppression, I see men and women each struggling to cope with sudden and continuing changes. Rather than recognising that each side has their own cross to bear, the two sides blame the other. Rather than teaming together to work out a mutually beneficial way to live together, raise families, and keep the economy going, the two sides have distanced themselves from each other. It is as if certain groups are arrogant enough to believe they can solve problems for everyone without consulting or including half of all those they purport to help!

    Another problem with such groups is that they promote a herd mentality, where rational and independent thinking suffer as consequence. The only thing such blogs and groups manage to achieve is to bounce off the other’s unhappiness and frustrations whilst talking these to death until the spectre of oppression becomes believable even to the most rational.

    Please note, I am not saying that problems in society do not exist, I am not encouraging people to shut up and do nothing about real issues that need rectifying nor am I blind to abuses of power, I just think reactionary movements fuelled by personal emotional traumas, self-declared victims, and people with chips on their shoulders are the worst kind of movement to condone, let alone be a part of – no matter how relevant the movement is.

    Blog for Balance
    I came across a wonderful blog last week called War of the Genders where Baron writes:

    Do we have to swing back and forth like a see-saw before we find that delicate balance? What will it take to become a rational society?

    In this blog I attempt to be neither here nor there but to provoke independent thinking. I try to show old issues in a new light instead of new issues in an old light. These sites made me realize that my balance is rare and that I’m the only one provoking with conservative opinions instead of stupid progressive ones. I will not link to these sites.

    My aims for this blog are very similar to Baron’s; the world doesn’t need yet another reactionary movement tipping the scales again towards one direction or another, we need to focus more effort upon building a balanced and rational society. We need to look at shock statistics and horror stories for what they are. We need to look at the issues for what they are. We need to stop thinking along emotive lines and start screwing our rational heads on and actually look honestly and plainly at the problems placed upon the table. Each of us needs to pour ourselves a drink and sit at this table together and discuss solutions.

    Roll up your sleeves ladies and gentlemen, the gender revolution is still moving, and we have work to do!

    You don’t need to be a feminist, or join the MRA movement to make a difference. Just read a variety of books on the subject, don’t accept statistics without researching them, and never stop asking questions and demanding answers. Share your experiences, the lessons you have learnt, what you understand to be the truth in an honest and real way, and you can make a difference.

    I write to share this understanding, to erase this feeling of powerlessness and I try to make even the smallest difference. If only one person comes away from this blog pondering on what I have written (even if that is just to ponder what the bleeding heck I am talking about ;) ) I will have achieved my objective.

    This is why I blog.

    Related Articles

  • Individually and collectively, we are responsible for how the sexual revolution develops in the present and into the future
  • Any movement that is influential in moulding the shape of the sexual revolution should not be immune to constructive criticism.
  • Any movement that has the potential to mould the shape of the sexual revolution should be solution-orientated rather than promoting a victim mentality
  • July 13, 2007

    Why Do I Blog?

    On my facebook account, under the section which asks me to reveal my religious persuasion, I write Champion Fence-Sitter.

    A few of my friends tease me about this answer, but they knew I was expressing the wry-truth about my personal belief-system. I am a long-time agnostic. I understand that the existence of God cannot be reliably proved or disproved, I prefer to admit that I do not know. While many would (and have) teased me that such a view is sitting on the fence, I view my response to be at the least an honest appraisal of the ongoing debate about God.

    I apply a similar attitude whilst I appraise the topic of gender. As far as my opinions on gender are concerned, I do not sit (at this time of writing) with any easy-to-identify camp. Perhaps under any Gender War heading you could call me a Champion Fence-Sitter but I think it is far more accurate to call me a conscientious objector to this futile war of gender ideologies.

    If I disagree with feminist ideology, it does not make me anti-women; nor do I have to be anti-feminist in order to support men’s rights. These are very narrow viewpoints to adopt and I get this idea that I have to “take sides” where no sides should exist. There doesn’t appear to be a middle way, this indicates that somewhere in this fray we have lost perspective and balance. The polarization of men and women in their respective camps and ideologies needs to stop if we want to improve our relationships with one another.

    I write as a human being for fellow human beings; not for (or against) feminists, MRAs, men, or women. I write because I want to do something about an issue which troubles me. I write for future generations. I am a young woman and I hope to one day settle down and have a family of my own. I would like know how to have a happy marriage and I don’t want to see my children grow up in this culture of mistrust, resentment, guilt, blame, and fear between the sexes. No rational parent would want to watch their children to grow up in broken households and relationships, or lead them to think that their existance is trivial on the basis of their gender.

    Most individuals and groups that discuss gender issues can at least agree that there is something uncomfortable and unhealthy occuring between the sexes, and that something needs to be done about it. What is sadly lacking from all the activity and discussion is any realisistic suggestions as to how to lend a helping hand to ease the situation. Finding a solution is next to impossible so long as everyone is busy pointing fingers. If we are not shocked out of this cycle of victimhood and blame in a way that would get us to DO something in our everyday lives besides rave against one group or another, more children will suffer as we argue smugly on.

    The name of this blog is Engender Truth and that is what I am interested in doing. I don’t give a damn about scoring points for or against any group, I am only interested in gaining an understanding of what is universally fair and true. I might be too little and too late but I cannot sit idly watching this happening without doing or saying something about it. I do not have all the answers, nor will I change the world, but if I can just make better sense of it, and help others make sense of it too, that would be a happy compromise.

    In summary, I write for engendertruth.com based on the belief that:-

  • The sexual revolution is still revolting…er… evolving
  • Individually and collectively, we are responsible for how the sexual revolution develops in the present and into the future
  • Any movement that is influential in moulding the shape of the sexual revolution should not be immune to constructive criticism.
  • Any movement that has the potential to mould the shape of the sexual revolution should be solution-orientated rather than promoting a victim mentality
  • Over the next four weeks, I intend to post a series of articles which will explore these ideas in more depth. So please check back for updates!

    Add to Technorati Favorites

    July 11, 2007

    Update: About Page

    Things have been a bit hectic this week but I am still (somewhat) alive. I am sure Teri and Zog are pleased to hear that I am still a ‘tard. I don’t intend to unsubscribe from the ‘tard support group yet. ;)

    I have been meaning to do this for over a year now, but I have finally written and published the about page today. It is amazes me that I can write words in their hundreds and thousands about most topics – but writing about myself and my intentions for this blog was a bit like squeezing blood from a stone. There are a couple of links I intend to add to that page, but these are links to articles that I am still in the process of writing and editing.

    I am going to go away now and kick a gnome…(my friends and family will grok what I mean by this, hehe!)

    July 7, 2007

    Tuneback! Tuneback! Tuneback!

    There… I said it.

    So I will say it again.

    Tuneback!

    Don’t worry readers; there is a method (and a cause) to my madness.

    What is a Tuneback? Well, the definition provided by tuneback.net is below:-

    Essentially, it’s a song that must be conceived, written, and recorded in less than an hour, and then put online. The song’s topic should be inspired by some kind of online, linkable source, (Tuneback comes from the word trackback in the blogosphere, and it was Joel who coined the term tuneback), but it’s not necessary, as the primary purpose is to create and produce a song inspired by something of substance, character and integrity.

    I am really impressed that Joel came up with such a concept. It is really fresh and innovative and it provides a real challenge for music-makers worldwide. It is, without a doubt, a concept that gives a lot of artistic freedom for new artists and deserves to be protected from commercial exploitation.

    I am going to set a challenge for fellow bloggers that care about the rights of artists and this is a similar suggestion taken from the post published on www.Tuneback.net and that is to make sure the word Tuneback is used in your next post. The idea is to make the concept widely known for reasons as stated on the site:

    “If we can show that the word has been used in a widespread manner without reference to a commercial trademark, but to a concept, we can prevent the possibility of further exploitation and render the word Tuneback commercially valueless as it will become a generic term applied to this particular song format and embracing a wide range of material.”

    So please, if you can, introduce your readership to the Tuneback concept with the next blog post you make! Pass it on to your blogging buddies, tell your friends about it – tell your grandma too. The more creative ways you use to refer to the concept in your blog, the better.

    Are you up to the challenge? Go on! I dare you! ;)